Close

New York Probate and Estate Administration Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Court rejects children’s allegations of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity. In re Burrows, No. 2022-01936 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 18, 2022)

Families often find themselves entangled in disputes over wills, particularly when claims of lacking testamentary capacity and undue influence arise. Such disagreements frequently arise due to differing interpretations of the deceased’s intentions or changes in familial dynamics. Courts, cognizant of the gravity of these allegations, meticulously assess each claim. To…

Updated:

Court found that testator was of sound mind when he executed his will. In Matter of the Estate of Scher, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 51819 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 2008)

In New York, being of “sound mind” to execute a will means that the testator must possess testamentary capacity. See EPTL § 3-1.1. This entails understanding the nature and consequences of making a will, knowing the extent of one’s property, and recognizing the natural beneficiaries. While a presumption of having…

Updated:

Surrogate’s Court considered whether it had the authority to probate a Florida-made where there was estate property in Queens. Matter of Steiner 2023 NY Slip Op 51224(U)

When someone who lived elsewhere passes away but owns property in New York, a probate proceeding can be initiated in the Surrogate’s Court in the county where the property is located. SCPA § 206 [1], which grants the Surrogate’s Court jurisdiction over the estate of a non-domiciliary decedent who leaves…

Updated:

Appellate Division considered whether a objectant had standing to challenge the validity of a will. In Matter of Mancuso, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52151 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 2006)

In New York, having standing to contest a will means having a direct and adverse interest in the probate proceedings. To challenge a will, an individual must demonstrate a pecuniary or financial stake in the estate that would be adversely affected by the will’s admission to probate. Simply being an…

Updated:

Court considered whether ancillary letters of administration should be issued. Matter of Dillon 2017 NY Slip Op 27388

Matter of Dillon, 2017 NY Slip Op 27388 involves the estate of Terry J. Dillon, who died intestate in Maryland in 2016. A Small Estate Petition was filed in Maryland, where the decedent’s son, Jason M. Dillon, was appointed as the personal representative. Subsequently, Jason filed a petition in New…

Updated:

Legal fees related to managing an estate that included a wrongful death settlement. Matter of Bender 2015 NY Slip Op 51929(U)

In the intricate landscape of estate administration, the case of Douglas A. Bender’s intestate demise brings to light the complexities surrounding wrongful death claims and the allocation of settlement proceeds. This blog delves into the details of the case, exploring the legal intricacies, orders of the court, and the pivotal…

Updated:

Appellate Division considered an allegation of undue influence. Niola v. Sarno, 939 N.Y.S.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Contested probate proceedings often unravel complex familial dynamics and legal intricacies, and the case at hand is no exception. In this case that was heard by the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, the issue of fraud and undue influence in the execution of Maria Capuano’s will was at issue. Undue influence…

Updated:

Appellate Division vacated a decree that allocated all settlement proceeds to the wrongful death cause of action. Matter of Buscemi 32 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

The intricacies of wrongful death settlements often unravel in unforeseen ways, as evidenced by Matter of Buscemi, 32 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006), a case that developed following the death Lorraine C. Buscemi’s tragic demise. A wrongful death compromise arises when an individual’s demise results from another party’s wrongful…

Updated:

Court considered allegations of undue influence by decedent’s live in girlfriend. In re DiDomenico 101 A.D.3d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Undue influence in the context of probate refers to the exertion of improper pressure or coercion that significantly impacts an individual’s free will in executing a will or trust. It involves manipulating the testator to make provisions that they may not have otherwise made, undermining their independent decision-making. The legal…

Updated:

Court reviewed whether there was reason to remove co-executors of an estate. Matter of Gadziala 2017 NY Slip Op 50123(U)

A contested will refers to a legal situation where disagreements arise among heirs or beneficiaries regarding the validity or terms of a deceased person’s will. Such disputes often involve challenges to the will’s authenticity, claims of undue influence, coercion, or disputes over the rightful distribution of assets. When individuals contest…

Contact Us